Sex offenders will pay a fine to fund child advocacy centers. A Senate change split Democrats
House Bill 2443, now Act 84 of 2026, passed the House without a no vote twice. In the Senate, an Appropriations Committee amendment drew seven Democratic no votes, and one senator changed his final vote on reconsideration.
Pennsylvania will charge people convicted of sex offenses a new fine of up to $1,000 and use the money to help pay for the state's 41 Children's Advocacy Centers, under a bill Gov. Josh Shapiro signed on Oct. 22, Spotlight PA reported.
The centers are where children who may have been abused are interviewed by trained staff, examined and connected to counseling, so a family doesn't have to repeat the story to police, doctors and caseworkers separately. They serve about 14,000 children a year, according to Spotlight PA, which cited the statewide association, Children's Advocacy Centers of Pennsylvania.
What the law does
House Bill 2443 creates a Child Victim Recovery Fee, scaled to the seriousness of the conviction, and a Child Victim Recovery Fund run by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. Spotlight PA reported that the commission expects the fee to raise $3.6 million to $3.9 million a year, assuming about 55% of fines are collected. The commission must set a noncompetitive formula for grants to the centers, which can pay for forensic interviews, medical exams, mental health treatment, victim advocacy and operations.
The state now sets aside about $2 million a year for the centers from birth certificate fees, according to Spotlight PA. The fines take effect in April.
Rep. Kyle Mullins, a Lackawanna County Democrat who sponsored the bill, said the centers have been "operating on shoestring budgets," Spotlight PA reported. It is now Act 84 of 2026, according to the bill's history.
Advertisement
What the records add
Co-sponsors from both parties. Mullins's lead co-sponsor is Rep. Jim Rigby, a Cambria County Republican. The bill page lists 44 co-sponsors: 33 Democrats and 11 Republicans.
No House opposition. The House passed the bill 202-0 on June 17 and agreed to the Senate's changes 203-0 on Oct. 21.
Four months in Senate Appropriations. The Senate Judiciary Committee approved it 14-0 on June 23. The next day it went to the Senate Appropriations Committee, where it stayed 118 days, until Oct. 20, according to the bill's history.
The amendment vote. On Oct. 20, Appropriations adopted an amendment 15-7, according to the committee roll call. Spotlight PA reported that the change removed an "ability-to-pay" provision that would have let judges excuse some defendants from the fine based on their finances. All 15 yes votes but one came from Republicans; Democratic Sen. Patty Kim also voted yes. The seven no votes were Democrats: Sens. Amanda Cappelletti, Jay Costa, Art Haywood, Vincent Hughes, Timothy Kearney, Judith Schwank and Sharif Street.
Committee Chair Scott Martin, a Lancaster County Republican, said removing the provision addressed concerns that fees wouldn't be applied evenly across counties, according to Spotlight PA. The committee then sent the bill to the floor 19-3, with Haywood, Kearney and Street voting no.
A vote taken twice. On Oct. 21 the full Senate passed the amended bill 48-2, with Democratic Sens. Timothy Kearney and Lindsey Williams voting no. The Senate then reconsidered the vote and passed it again 47-3. The only change was Street, who voted yes the first time and no the second. The roll calls don't record why.
What happens next
The fines start in April. Before then, the commission has to build its distribution formula, and it must reduce grants proportionally if collections fall short, Spotlight PA reported. Advocates told Spotlight the collection rate is hard to predict, and the association has estimated the centers need $14.5 million a year from sources other than the state to be fully funded.
This is the second law this month aimed at children harmed by abuse or exploitation; we covered Alicia's Law, Act 71, on Saturday. A separate proposal to give adult survivors of child sexual abuse a window to sue has not had a Senate vote.